Analyse of Covid-19 Pandemic - to be an absolute must for everyone

Posted in Service Public

Dr. Wolfgang WodargI would like to tell something about the Coronavirus Epidemic that we allegedly are having right now.

First I thought this Hype is going to end again, but is has increased so much, and we finally have to start taking a closer look.

I (Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg) worked as a doctor and conducted a health department, I had my own sentinel, my own monitoring system for Flu diseases. And every year I observed how many people became sick in an area of 150,000 inhabitants. Every new year – worlwide - we have new types of viruses because the viruses have to change themselves. If the same viruses came again in the next year , our Immune System would recognize them, so they would not be able to make us sick or to multiply – which is what they want. So they regulary have to change a bit and that's why we have new variants of these viruses every year.

There are about 100 different types of viruses that are changing constandly. Up to now, we didn't really care which viruses caused this Flu … or disease or however you want to call it. But there have been Investigations over several years in Glasgow (UK) there the tried to use the available tests – that means they didn't examine all 100 types, but just the ones they had tests for. So they looked at maybe 8 or 10 different viruses and coronaviruses have always been part of them. These are the figures from Glasgow (UK) Starting from 2005 to 2013 they checked which viruses occur among respiratory Diseases.Corona 001

And these colored columns are the viruses.The green parts refer to the Coronaviruses that was always in the Mix. The Coronaviruses normally make up 7% to 15% maybe 5% to 14% , acute respiratury diseases: Normally 7% to 15% of viruses are Coronaviruses. Hence ,it's just normal that a big part of viruses are Coronaviruses.

So the following happens: In WUHAN there is the biggest safety laboratory for viruses in whole China. So they are a lot of Experts on the topic, dealing witch it all day long. WUHAN is a big City, 11 Million Inhabitants, big hospitals, big Intensive care Units, always people being ventilated, people with pneumonia ….. hundreds of them and they did tests which a few patient's, less than 50, looked for the viruses they had and examined there RNA in the laboratory and they found a new Type. This attracted their Attention.

When a Virologist finds something like this he puts it in a Global Data Base. And this Data Base is accessible for scientists all over the world, in Berlin for Example. In Berlin they checked and compared this new entryand tried to create a test to measure this new variant of Coronaviruses. Then Mr. DROSTEN submitted a protocol to the WHO, and it got admitted really quickly. Usually, as a test considered a product of medicine, it has to be validated. That means it has to be checked very precisely.

What does this test actually say ? What does it measure ? The mentioned test is an Inhouse-Test developed in the Charité-Clinic (Germany). But because there weren't any validated and the great panic arose, it was decided to just use this test everywhere. And then Mr. DROSTEN provided the test. Of course the virologist can't say if the virus is dangerous or not. He can only say:”This one is different”or “We have a test for this” …... But is the virus dangerous, Mr. DROSTEN ? How is he supposed to know ? He would need further Epidemological data based on Observations of how sick the people are. How fast do they get healthy again? Are there more victims than before ? That's why it is important to look at the data from previous years to compare them.

To look at the mortality rates to see how many people died of the virus. So while looking for a specific virus, for example the Coronavirus, you can examine the total Population. What you will find is that presumably around 8% or 10% of the Population will have some kind of virus, that makes them sick.

But if you examine medical practices, do your test there, to determine who is sick, then of course you would find a lot more positive caces. And if you examine Hospitals and take samples there, then you would find even more Corona- infected people.

That is to say, depending on which proportions of the population you examine – whether it is the whole population, patients in the waiting room, people in the Clinic or when you examine very ill patients in the Intensive care unit that are about to die – you will expectedly find these 7% - 15% Coronaviruses every time you do a test.

However, if they die of the Coronavirus or of other viruses while just having also Corona can't be determined for sure with this.

So when you look at the death rates in Italy, you want to know where the tests have been taken.

Where and how have these few available tests been used ? If they were used in a Hospital on serious or terminally ill caces then obvioously the Corona death rates rises. Just because it looked like it, because of the specific group that was examined. Mortality, disease-specific mortality – refers to the percentage of dead among the people infected with this disease and concerning the seasonal acute respiratory disease – commonly known as the flu – there is a mortality of 0,1%, which already is the maximum. That means that one in athousand Flu-infected Inhabitants dies-every winter. So now we will have to see whether this number increased because of Coronaviruses.

The Assumption for Germany is that there are 20,000 or 30,000 more deaths than without the Flu. This is called excess mortality !

So now we know that Coronaviruses always make up 5% to 14% of all Flu viruses – lets say 10%.

Let us assume that in the previous years we tested all seriously ill patients in the Hospital on the Coronavirus- which of course didn't happen – we would have expected to find 2,000 to 3,000 people dying of a FLU each year, that also had the Coronavirus.  And we still are fae away from these numbers. Apparently it is the case that virologists created something very sensatuel here, and with their creation they really impressed the Chinese Government as well.

The Chinese Government made something really big out of it, suddenly this was very important politically – completely exceeding the virological frame. All of a sudden , face recogniton was installed everywhere at the Airports, fever was being measured .

The Clinical Thermometer controlled the traffic on Chinese streets. And all this was so significant that it lead to international consequences, politicians had to deal with it, had to take a stand.

Then the virologists came into play again. The Government asked their own virologists and they confirmed that this virus is a thing to worry about and proposed to develop tests to help measure the virus-like in China. Something was woven around this ! A Network of Information and opinions has been developed in certain expert groups.And the politicians turned to these expert groups, who initially started all this. And they really absorbed this network, moved within it.

This lead to politicians who now are just resting on these arguments, while using these arguments to evaluate who has to be helped, to determine safety measures or what has to be permitted. All these decisions have just been derived from these arguments. Which means that now it's going to be very hard for critics to say “STOP , there is nothing going on.”

And this reminds me of this fairytale about the king witout clotheson. And just a smale child was able to say: “ Hey, he is naked”.

All the others on the courtyard – surrounding the Government and asking the Government for advise, because they can't know themselves – they all played along and joined the hype. And like this, politicians are being courted by many scientists. Scientists, who want to be important in politics because they need money for their institutions. Scientists, who just swim along in this mainstream and also want their part …. “We can help too!” We made an app.” We have a program for this !” ….. So many people saying “Hey, we want to help too !”, because they want to earn money with it and become important.

And was is missing at the moment is a rational way of looking at things. We should ask questions like “How have you found out that the virus is dangerous ?” “How was it before ?” “Didn't we have the same thing last year ?””Is it even something new ?” That is missing !

"And the king is naked !"